...

If we value the pursuit of knowledge, we must be free to follow wherever that search may lead us. ~ Adlai Stevenson

Sunday, November 4, 2012

Sunday Smatterings... Physics First?

The Boy has a deep interest in physics, an interest we have not explored nearly enough. In all my recent research, I keep coming across the same idea... that a study of physics should precede studies of biology and chemistry, rather than occupying last place in a student's science rotation.

Why? (the following is excerpted from Reasons to Teach Physics Before Biology and Chemistry)

  • Physics is a more concrete science that encourages exploration and improves oral and written communication skills. (source)
  • Students who take physics first are more likely to continue in science, enrolling in rigorous levels of chemistry and biology. (source)
  • "In studying physics, students study algebra simultaneously, motivating them with a sense of the power of mathematics." (source)
  • "Physics begins with everyday phenomena requiring few new words: motion, velocity, acceleration, falling objects, a sense of gravity as a force, and some new concepts, e.g. mass, momentum, and energy, but with crisp definitions." (source)

Of course, much of this is in reference to high school aged students, which I don't have... yet. But why not physics first for a middle school student? The Well Trained Mind advocates a 4 year cycle: biology; earth/space; chemistry; physics. I am looking at turning this on its head, more or less: physics, then chemistry, followed by biology and anatomy, and then earth/space.

Of course there is, conversely, the idea of intertwining the threads of science, which is posited in Building Foundations of Scientific Understanding, a book I dearly love, but have yet to implement well. I was actually just looking over my flow charts for volumes 1-2, and though about trying to rearrange them so that we immerse ourselves a little more in each thread/topic, rather than skipping around. Hmmmm.....

I think for now, we'll work through this book (which has some chemistry too - bonus!)...



And I may add in some information from this, which happens to be one of The Boy's all time favorite books...



We'll give the "Physics First" argument a good trial, and then go from there!

2 comments :

  1. We're really enjoying physics this year, too. Our favorite physics "experiment book" has been Backyard Ballistics. Hands down. We've had a blasting good time with that book. Pun intended. ;-)

    (http://www.amazon.com/Backyard-Ballistics-Cannons-Cincinnati-Dynamite/dp/1613740646/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1352064798&sr=8-1&keywords=backyard+ballistics)

    ReplyDelete
  2. My 13 year old daughter has been begging to take more physics for two years now, ever since a short unit with it but not sure how to successfully accomplish it since I am so not a science person. I am hoping next year for 9th grade I can find a local science class for her. We've tried a couple books at home and experiments, etc but it always falls rather flat and isn't very exciting. I think she'd have more fun with other kids doing the same stuff.

    ReplyDelete

What lies behind us and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us.
Emerson

Thanks for stopping by! I love comments :)